New Mission

New Mission


My mission is to explore how other countries around the world are dealing with education and special education issues.

I would like to visit and observe different types of schools that have proven records of success, wherever those schools may be. I would like to meet with school directors and administrators, government officials, leaders in the business world, and others who are responsible for implementing education systems or otherwise connected to education to learn more about how education is being addressed in their communities.

If you know of any remarkable schools in other parts of the world (especially special needs schools), please let me know about them. If you know of any education experts who are engaged in remarkable work in this field, please introduce me to them.

Please do not hesitate to share your thoughts or ideas regarding the above. Read more about my mission here.

Search This Blog

Monday, September 20, 2010

Early Intervention

New York State law clearly defines who is eligible for early intervention services.  According to the regulations of the New York State Department of Health, a child is generally entitled to EI services from birth until the age of three.  But, if the child turns three on or after September 1, the child is eligible to continue receiving EI services until January 2 of the next calendar year.

So then why does the Department of Education tell parents different?  In a recent case, the mother of a child with autism exercised her right to continue EI services until January 2 following the child's third birthday.  The mother told the Department that she would be needing a preschool placement for her child once the EI services expired.  The Department responded that no programs were available and blamed the mother for extending the EI services.  They were basically saying, "You should have come to us in September."

When the Department failed to recommend a program, the mother placed her child in a private school capable of meeting his needs and we filed a claim for tuition reimbursement.  The Department ultimately decided not to fight the case because its position was not supported by the law.  The claim was settled and the parent received 100% of the funding she was seeking.